ftp.cc.uoc.gr
rfc3742
This is a purely informative rendering of an RFC that includes verified errata. This rendering may not be used as a reference.

The following 'Verified' errata have been incorporated in this document: EID 236
Network Working Group                                           S. Floyd
Request for Comments: 3742                                          ICSI
Category: Experimental                                        March 2004


        Limited Slow-Start for TCP with Large Congestion Windows

Status of this Memo

   This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet
   community.  It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
   Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
   Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).  All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

   This document describes an optional modification for TCP's slow-start
   for use with TCP connections with large congestion windows.  For TCP
   connections that are able to use congestion windows of thousands (or
   tens of thousands) of MSS-sized segments (for MSS the sender's
   MAXIMUM SEGMENT SIZE), the current slow-start procedure can result in
   increasing the congestion window by thousands of segments in a single
   round-trip time.  Such an increase can easily result in thousands of
   packets being dropped in one round-trip time.  This is often
   counter-productive for the TCP flow itself, and is also hard on the
   rest of the traffic sharing the congested link.  This note describes
   Limited Slow-Start as an optional mechanism for limiting the number
   of segments by which the congestion window is increased for one
   window of data during slow-start, in order to improve performance for
   TCP connections with large congestion windows.

1.  Introduction

   This note describes an optional modification for TCP's slow-start for
   use with TCP connections with large congestion windows.  For TCP
   connections that are able to use congestion windows of thousands (or
   tens of thousands) of MSS-sized segments (for MSS the sender's
   MAXIMUM SEGMENT SIZE), the current slow-start procedure can result in
   increasing the congestion window by thousands of segments in a single
   round-trip time.  Such an increase can easily result in thousands of
   packets being dropped in one round-trip time.  This is often
   counter-productive for the TCP flow itself, and is also hard on the
   rest of the traffic sharing the congested link.  This note describes
   Limited Slow-Start, limiting the number of segments by which the

   congestion window is increased for one window of data during slow-
   start, in order to improve performance for TCP connections with large
   congestion windows.

   When slow-start results in a large increase in the congestion window
   in one round-trip time, a large number of packets might be dropped in
   the network (even with carefully-tuned active queue management
   mechanisms in the routers).  This drop of a large number of packets
   in the network can result in unnecessary retransmit timeouts for the
   TCP connection.  The TCP connection could end up in the congestion
   avoidance phase with a very small congestion window, and could take a
   large number of round-trip times to recover its old congestion
   window.  This poor performance is illustrated in [F02].

2.  The Proposal for Limited Slow-Start

   Limited Slow-Start introduces a parameter, "max_ssthresh", and
   modifies the slow-start mechanism for values of the congestion window
   where "cwnd" is greater than "max_ssthresh".  That is, during Slow-
   Start, when

      cwnd <= max_ssthresh,

   cwnd is increased by one MSS (MAXIMUM SEGMENT SIZE) for every
   arriving ACK (acknowledgement) during slow-start, as is always the
   case.  During Limited Slow-Start, when

      max_ssthresh < cwnd <= ssthresh,

      the invariant is maintained that the congestion window is 
   increased during slow-start by at most max_ssthresh MSS per
   round-trip time (and at least max_ssthresh/2 MSS per round-trip
   time).  This is done as follows:
EID 236 (Verified) is as follows:

Section: 2

Original Text:

   the invariant is maintained so that the congestion window is
   increased during slow-start by at most max_ssthresh/2 MSS per round-
   trip time. 

Corrected Text:

   the invariant is maintained that the congestion window is
   increased during slow-start by at most max_ssthresh MSS per
   round-trip time (and at least max_ssthresh/2 MSS per round-trip
   time).
Notes:

Later in Section 2:
it
takes:

log(max_ssthresh) + (cwnd - max_ssthresh)/(max_ssthresh/2)

round-trip times to reach a congestion window of cwnd, for a
congestion window greater than max_ssthresh.
Should be:
it
takes at least:

log(max_ssthresh) + (cwnd - max_ssthresh)/(max_ssthresh)

and at most:

log(max_ssthresh) + (cwnd - max_ssthresh)/(max_ssthresh/2)

round-trip times to reach a congestion window of cwnd, for a
congestion window greater than max_ssthresh.

Later in Section 2:
Thus, with Limited Slow-Start with max_ssthresh set to 100 MSS, it
would take 836 round-trip times to reach a congestion window of
83,000 packets,
Should be:
Thus, with Limited Slow-Start with max_ssthresh set to 100 MSS, it
would take at least 836 round-trip times to reach a congestion window of
83,000 packets,
For each arriving ACK in slow-start: If (cwnd <= max_ssthresh) cwnd += MSS; else K = int(cwnd/(0.5 max_ssthresh)); cwnd += int(MSS/K); Thus, during Limited Slow-Start the window is increased by 1/K MSS for each arriving ACK, for K = int(cwnd/(0.5 max_ssthresh)), instead of by 1 MSS as in standard slow-start [RFC2581]. When ssthresh < cwnd, slow-start is exited, and the sender is in the Congestion Avoidance phase. Our recommendation would be for max_ssthresh to be set to 100 MSS. (This is illustrated in the NS [NS] simulator, for snapshots after May 1, 2002, in the tests "./test-all-tcpHighspeed tcp1A" and "./test-all-tcpHighspeed tcpHighspeed1" in the subdirectory "tcl/lib". Setting max_ssthresh to Infinity causes the TCP connection in NS not to use Limited Slow-Start.) With Limited Slow-Start, when the congestion window is greater than max_ssthresh, the window is increased by at most 1/2 MSS for each arriving ACK; when the congestion window is greater than 1.5 max_ssthresh, the window is increased by at most 1/3 MSS for each arriving ACK, and so on. With Limited Slow-Start it takes: log(max_ssthresh) round-trip times to reach a congestion window of max_ssthresh, and it takes: log(max_ssthresh) + (cwnd - max_ssthresh)/(max_ssthresh/2) round-trip times to reach a congestion window of cwnd, for a congestion window greater than max_ssthresh. Thus, with Limited Slow-Start with max_ssthresh set to 100 MSS, it would take 836 round-trip times to reach a congestion window of 83,000 packets, compared to 16 round-trip times without Limited Slow-Start (assuming no packet drops). With Limited Slow-Start, the largest transient queue during slow-start would be 100 packets; without Limited Slow-Start, the transient queue during Slow-Start would reach more than 32,000 packets. By limiting the maximum increase in the congestion window in a round-trip time, Limited Slow-Start can reduce the number of drops during slow-start, and improve the performance of TCP connections with large congestion windows. 3. Experimental Results Tom Dunigan has added Limited Slow-Start to the Linux 2.4.16 Web100 kernel, and performed experiments comparing TCP with and without Limited Slow-Start [D02]. Results so far show improved performance for TCPs using Limited Slow-Start. There are also several experiments comparing different values for max_ssthresh. 4. Related Proposals There has been considerable research on mechanisms for the TCP sender to learn about the limitations of the available bandwidth, and to exit slow-start before receiving a congestion indication from the network [VEGAS,H96]. Other proposals set TCP's slow-start parameter ssthresh based on information from previous TCP connections to the same destination [WS95,G00]. This document proposes a simple limitation on slow-start that can be effective in some cases even in the absence of such mechanisms. The max_ssthresh parameter does not replace ssthresh, but is an additional parameter. Thus, Limited Slow-Start could be used in addition to mechanisms for setting ssthresh. Rate-based pacing has also been proposed to improve the performance of TCP during slow-start [VH97,AD98,KCRP99,ASA00]. We believe that rate-based pacing could be of significant benefit, and could be used in addition to the Limited Slow-Start in this proposal. Appropriate Byte Counting [RFC3465] proposes that TCP increase its congestion window as a function of the number of bytes acknowledged, rather than as a function of the number of ACKs received. Appropriate Byte Counting is largely orthogonal to this proposal for Limited Slow-Start. Limited Slow-Start is also orthogonal to other proposals to change mechanisms for exiting slow-start. For example, FACK TCP includes an overdamping mechanism to decrease the congestion window somewhat more aggressively when a loss occurs during slow-start [MM96]. It is also true that larger values for the MSS would reduce the size of the congestion window in units of MSS needed to fill a given pipe, and therefore would reduce the size of the transient queue in units of MSS. 5. Acknowledgements This proposal is part of a larger proposal for HighSpeed TCP for TCP connections with large congestion windows, and resulted from simulations done by Evandro de Souza, in joint work with Deb Agarwal. This proposal for Limited Slow-Start draws in part from discussions with Tom Kelly, who has used a similar modified slow-start in his own research with congestion control for high-bandwidth connections. We also thank Tom Dunigan for his experiments with Limited Slow-Start. We thank Andrei Gurtov, Reiner Ludwig, members of the End-to-End Research Group, and members of the Transport Area Working Group, for feedback on this document. 6. Security Considerations This proposal makes no changes to the underlying security of TCP. 7. References 7.1. Normative References [RFC2581] Allman, M., Paxson, V. and W. Stevens, "TCP Congestion Control", RFC 2581, April 1999. [RFC3465] Allman, M., "TCP Congestion Control with Appropriate Byte Counting (ABC)", RFC 3465, February 2003. 7.2. Informative References [AD98] Mohit Aron and Peter Druschel, "TCP: Improving Start-up Dynamics by Adaptive Timers and Congestion Control"", TR98-318, Rice University, 1998. URL "http://cs- tr.cs.rice.edu/Dienst/UI/2.0/Describe/ncstrl.rice_cs/TR98- 318/". [ASA00] A. Aggarwal, S. Savage, and T. Anderson, "Understanding the Performance of TCP Pacing", Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Infocom Conference, Tel-Aviv, Israel, March, 2000. URL "http://www.cs.ucsd.edu/~savage/". [D02] T. Dunigan, "Floyd's TCP slow-start and AIMD mods", 2002. URL "http://www.csm.ornl.gov/~dunigan/net100/floyd.html". [F02] S. Floyd, "Performance Problems with TCP's Slow-Start", 2002. URL "http://www.icir.org/floyd/hstcp/slowstart/". [G00] A. Gurtov, "TCP Performance in the Presence of Congestion and Corruption Losses", Master's Thesis, University of Helsinki, Department of Computer Science, Helsinki, December 2000. URL "http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/gurtov/papers/ms_thesis.html". [H96] J. C. Hoe, "Improving the Start-up Behavior of a Congestion Control Scheme for TCP", SIGCOMM 96, 1996. URL "http://www.acm.org/sigcomm/sigcomm96/program.html". [KCRP99] J. Kulik, R. Coulter, D. Rockwell, and C. Partridge, "A Simulation Study of Paced TCP", BBN Technical Memorandum No. 1218, 1999. URL "http://www.ir.bbn.com/documents/techmemos/index.html". [MM96] M. Mathis and J. Mahdavi, "Forward Acknowledgment: Refining TCP Congestion Control", SIGCOMM, August 1996. [NS] The Network Simulator (NS). URL "http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/". [VEGAS] Vegas Web Page, University of Arizona. URL "http://www.cs.arizona.edu/protocols/". [VH97] Vikram Visweswaraiah and John Heidemann, "Rate Based Pacing for TCP", 1997. URL "http://www.isi.edu/lsam/publications/rate_based_pacing/". [WS95] G. Wright and W. Stevens, "TCP/IP Illustrated", Volume 2, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1995. Authors' Address Sally Floyd ICIR (ICSI Center for Internet Research) Phone: +1 (510) 666-2989 EMail: floyd@icir.org URL: http://www.icir.org/floyd/ Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78 and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Intellectual Property The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org. Acknowledgement Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society.